Comments on: Michael Jackson Dead, Age 50

By: SoNoFab***h

SoNoFab***h — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:32:32 +0000

Oh, hell no. He did it, he was a pedo freak. His death changes NOTHING IMO except the fact that some children can now be safer. No mercy for pedo’s, even in death.

Neverland employees claimed they SAW him fondle boys

Records of sleeping arrangements that were kept very strictly conveniently disappeared

There was only one recorded case of a female child joining in the sleepovers. Reason? MJ wanted little boys for SEX. Among hundreds of sleepovers in his room only one female.

Enormous payouts to keep witnesses and victims silent

MJ’s body language and choice of words in his interviews and defense are very telling. He NEVER said “I have never molested or gotten sexual gratification with a child”, instead tiptoeing around the real issue.

His sexuality has always been suspect IMO. No problem with being gay, but rumors would start to circulate about log term lovers or one night stands if gay was all he was. Instead, we hear nothing except continual rumors about little boys. Even his former wives are silent on the subject. Hell, MJ even says flat-out that DR was artificially inseminated with his sperm. (Another lie, those kids are no more his genetically then they are mine), but I believe the AI part. I don’t think MJ could get it up for any adult, male or female. He even describes his terror and inability to have sex with Tatum ONeal as a teenager- the horniest time of any normal person’s life. He was victimized himself as a child and most likely the only way he could experience power was to victimize children himself.

By: MOMMIESDOLLIES1

MOMMIESDOLLIES1 — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:16:42 +0000

I totally agree —

Human Nature dictates “we seek what we can’t have”.

By: Angelfire

Angelfire — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:10:45 +0000

MOMMIE, it was almost like he was trying to get his childhood back even after he was an adult. I blame his father for what he became. He ended up being a lost soul who never found his childhood.

By: CantSleep

CantSleep — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:35:48 +0000

LOL Wolfman, well I have three daughters, I doubt Mr Jackson would have been rolling out the red lollipop carpet for my kids…
However, you make an excellent point, and that is these parents who allow their children, and themselves to be blinded by celebrity and then put in uncomfy situations…of course it didnt stop those parents from cashing large checks from MJ and thats the worst of it…ONCE AGAIN, our collective children, not safe with their own family…I know a few of us disagree whether any kind molestation occurred, I firmly believe it did, but no, I wastnt there, I didnt see it happen, so we can debate it till the cows come home, but I think we can all agree with WolfmanJack, the children who brought accusations against him may have never even been put in that position if it werent (again!!) for the very people who are supposed to protect and care for them…

By: WolfmanJack

WolfmanJack — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:09:47 +0000

What kind of parents would leave their kids with Michael jackson (or any other stranger) for a weekend? Some so-called “parents” put their kids in harm’s way so they could get some easy money.

Any normal parent would say, “OK, you can meet Michael, OK, you can play for a while, but you can’t stay overnight”.

By: Pep610

Pep610 — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:51:58 +0000

Hi MommiesDollies. How have you been? Still on the mend? Doing good here. Been enjoying a family reunion on Facebook. My daughter signed me up on it when she was here on Father’s Day after nagging me for months to get on there and now I’m addicted to it. LOL!

You know, when I think of all the songs Michael Jackson wrote about love and world peace, etc., I have a hard time believing he abused anybody. I don’t think it was in his nature to hurt a fly. On the other hand, some of the things going on in this world are so friggin evil that it’s hard to believe that anyone is pure innocence anymore as we’d have to believe of Michael when sharing his bed with kids. He was strange enough, though, that it could be possible.

Take care!

By: Pep610

Pep610 — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:37:24 +0000

I wouldn’t give Michael a pass for any reason whatsoever if I thought he was abusing children…and I don’t care how bad his childhood was. My first impression, because Michael was such a strange duck, was that he probably was abusing children. After listening to the evidence and reading everything about the claims against him, I came to the conclusion that the parents of the children making the accusations were liars and looking for a quick buck.

Uri Geller claims he put Michael under deep hynosis and even then Michael claimed his innocence. If so, I hope his name will be cleared. I hate to see anybody wrongly accused.

By: CantSleep

CantSleep — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:37:20 +0000

I agree that Michael Jackson was a victim WHEN HE WAS A CHILD, he has to grow up much too soon, like all other child celebs, BUT, he did become of age at some point, and those around him knew he had serious, serious issues…I am not going to give him a pass because he had a screwy childhood…regardless of his upbringing, I truly believe he would done the same thing, and abused little boys…Honesly, how many boys WOULDN’T change their story and say “I lied”, can you imagine the shame and trauma some kids have been through? Wouldnt it be easier to just say “ehhh, I lied, never happened”? Do you know how many abuse victims change their story, to protect their abuser and sometimes to protect themselves, because they simply cannot cope with the damage that comes with being a victim of a Pedo.
I believe Michael Jackson was a sick, sick man. He was surrounded by enablers and yes mem, and YES he was a Pedophile.

By: MOMMIESDOLLIES1

MOMMIESDOLLIES1 — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:08:29 +0000

Hi Pep it’s been a while. Haven’t seen you. Hope all is well.

I am of the same mind set. I agree he was the cash cow for everyone just like Elvis. I gotta wonder if he was really doing these things and those closest to him knew it why didn’t anyone Reach out to get him help. His lawyer went on tv after he passed away and claimed Michael was using drugs that he was afraid this would turn out like Anna Nicole Smith, if they were so worried then why Not GET HIM HELP? My feeling is they probably figured they would be cut off. He supported his entire family for years as a young child. That is a lot of pressure for someone in his position.

By: Pep610

Pep610 — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:18:52 +0000

I never thought Michael molested those kids. The parents were too shady to me. I didn’t think Michael could write the songs about love, peace, etc. as he did if he were abusing kids. He wasn’t an idiot. He was a strange person, for sure, but probably being a cash cow for everyone and their mother made him enjoy the company of children because they didn’t want anything from him and were innocent. It seemed he just enjoyed providing a good time to kids that he never got to enjoy himself as a kid.

I also thought he paid out the $25M so they’d choke on it. May this come back now and burn them!

If Michael was indeed innocent, as I think he was, I hope it will be proven and his name cleared.